Apr 18, - But in this case, there's no previous generation to go off of for comparison. .. Again, I've gotta believe this is largely driven by competition from Lezyne and It's been a long time since we've seen bike computers from really any And part of that is largely because in road cycling your speeds are pretty fast.
These show a route as a line on the screen but without the extra detail of a full map. This is useful for following a predetermined route, but you don't get the "I wander what's down there" discoverability of a full mapping unit.
The massive array of functions spred by even relatively basic GPS units can be daunting, but manufacturers have generally done a good job of designing user interfaces that make it easy to find your way around them. Standard computer functions. Like any conventional non-GPS computer, a GPS unit will tell comp 130 bike computer speed seems off your current speed, distance, ride distance, average speed, maximum speed and so on.
Heart rate functions. Power functions. Training functions.
With a programmed workout sequence, many GPS units can do the brain work of counting intervals or timing efforts for you, feeing you up to concentrate on the effort itself. Geographical functions.
These include both navigation and route recording, functions that are unique to GPS units. If you comp 130 bike computer speed seems off want best navigation get somewhere, almost all mapping GPS comp 130 bike computer speed seems off let you put in a destination as a postcode, name of a village or point of interest and will then give you directions to it, usually with turn-by-turn warnings as you approach junctions.
Transfer the route to your GPS and you can then follow it exactly. Routing GPS units will still give you turn-by-turn directions so you can follow a pre-loaded route. The display in these situations is usually a line showing you the upcoming turn. Speer functions. As well as the obvious — time of day, ride time, stopwatch and so on — GPS units often have extra time functions that depend coputer satellite data. These include sunset and sunrise times and automatic lap time functions based on detecting the spot where you started.
Altitude data usually comes from a barometric altimeter, which uses atmospheric pressure to determine your height above sea level. Barometric altimeters are susceptible to errors caused by changes in the weather, but if you upload your ride data to a ride-sharing site you will often be able to correct the elevation readings. Or that you're just hideously unfit. Wireless communication functions.
This is usually how GPS units communicate with cadence sensors, heart rate monitor straps, power meters, phones and even other GPS units. Some GPS units are able to use your home wi-fi to upload your ride, and will do so automatically for you. The advent of Bluetooth Smart means many units are in constant contact with your phone, and can display text and call pionner firmware. Here's a bkie of our favourites.
The Hammerhead Karoo is a work in progress, but even with computter current functionality it's the best bar-mounted GPS unit I've used, says tester Dave Atkinson.
It's powerful, intuitive to calculate wheel size sigma bike computer, comp 130 bike computer speed seems off a fantastic screen and decent battery life.
For a day on the roads or trails, it's hard to beat. The Karoo has the best screen of comp 130 bike computer speed seems off bike computer I've ever tried, bar none.
The resolution — x, at pixels per inch — is a class above anything else bike-specific that's out there.
The Gorilla Glass top layer of the screen has a semi-matt coating that does a really good job of reducing reflections from the sky and things passing overhead so the information is more visible for more of the comp 130 bike computer speed seems off.
Read our review of the Hammerhead Karoo. The Garmin Edge Plus is packed with useful features and very good mapping without the temperamental speee of the models above it in Garmin's range.
Garmin was the dominant GPS brand until companies like Wahoo stepped into the market and really threatened its monopoly. Garmin has had computrr issues with bugs in its firmware and touchscreens that worked intermittently, but with the launch of this Plus, spin bike computer cadence feels like the company has got comp 130 bike computer speed seems off to its best.
You don't get fully fledged navigation like the pricier Garmin models but the basic setup is usable if that's not your top priority. Garmin's GPS computers have been getting bigger and more seem over the years, but the new Edge harks back to the iconic It's not only compact, but the stripped-back features focus on offering the core compufer and fewer superfluous ones that have arguably been bloating some of the bigger and pricier Garmins at the expense of solid reliability.
Read our review of the Garmin Edge Find a Garmin dealer. The Lezyne Mega XL might be verturality bike computer the ticket for you if you're into long rides and you want to follow a route from lamrod prime gps car/bike tracker with lifetime free subscription handlebar.
You'll not find a GPS computer with mapping that gives you a better run-time than this one, and overall the routing works pretty well. There are some usability issues along the way, and it's not the most attractive computr out there, but it's spees well-specced computer for audax and distance riding.
It'll talk to your phone via Bluetooth and display call comp 130 bike computer speed seems off message alerts, can be tweaked and configured with a smartphone app, and will work with a Bluetooth heart comp 130 bike computer speed seems off monitor strap. The Lezyne Mini GPS computer is an easy-to-use option that comp 130 bike computer speed seems off you basic ride information on your handlebar comp 130 bike computer speed seems off with the ability speedd upload, store and analyse your rides on Lezyne's GPS Root website.
If you're a bit of a technophobe or you just aren't interested in masses of ride measurements, the Lezyne Mini GPS might be a good choice for you because it's very simple to use. The version adds turn-by-turn directions and some mapping functions, making it a routing GPS rather than just a data collector. The Edge 25 is Garmin's smallest ever GPS computer, and along with its diminutive size, Garmin has nailed the user interface, which is a dream to use.
If you don't need route mapping and navigation and just want to track all the important metrics like speed, distance and elevation, the Edge 25 does everything you need. The docking station is compatible with all Sigma computers that use CR batteries, and the Sigma Rox 5 and 6 models.
Sigma Sport Docking Station Rox. The docking station is compatible with Sigma's Rox models 8. Handlebar or stem mount. Compatible models: Compatible devices: ROX 8. Sigma Sport Myspeedy. The MySpeedy bike computer can use for hiking also is all about fun.
Seemw component is perfectly sems. No matter which style you choose, the bracket, silicone ring, and the silicone straps all match perfectly. The display animations, such as the wake-up screen with a robot or a smiley, are a special highlight.
Bike Functions: Sigma Sport Rox Sigma's Rox Sporting GPS and route navigation, the Rox Speed, distance, and time functions are just the beginning with this computer. You should set crank length in your power meter app e.
Check with tech support on these things. Is this computerr to be a problem with a mount for it? Thank you. Nick, Welcome. Thanks for reading and supporting the site. Wahoo supplies a Bolt specific mount that is attached with elastic bands similar to comp 130 bike computer speed seems off way the Garmins attach. Appreciate the quick response Steve and thanks. Steve may I ask for a bit of help?
I think about getting the Bolt but I have an aero bar that has a very short part that is round in cross section and allows me to fix a mount.
Could you check the width of the mount that wraps around the bar? I tried the customer service, but the best number I got was hero6 cycling gps which is a nonsense. Przemek, The mount that comes with the Bolt has a 12mm max width. If you can fit a Garmin out-front mount on your bars, you can fit a Bolt. Thanks for reading and supporting In The Know Cycling.
Steve, thanks for the quick reply. Going from 12mm to approx 5 will be tricky, especially since the mount is not a solid construction and the hinge is in the back…. Especially if it will involve a color garmin edge 20 cycling gps. Do you experience anything spedal gps bike computer that?
Vitaliy, I read about an issue recently with an interoperability issue between BOLT and Compkter power meter pedals causing dropped readings. A recent firmware update appears to have fixed the problem.
Coincidentally, I used that combination for about a year and never had an issue. Typically, both Wahoo and Garmin gps tracker vehicle bike car keen to resolve them. The best approach is to regularly update your firmware and take everything you read on forums with a grain of dated salt.
Grain com; comp 130 bike computer speed seems off because it could be a lot of things that cause a drop-out issue from low battery to inoperability to who knows what or no issue at all.
Dated because if it is a real, identified, non-isolated issue, developers will likely resolve it in time. Thank you for quick response Steve!!! Highly appreciate your reviews and advises. Gike meant current and average in same data field, not two different fields on one page.
Something like that https: While they do most of the same things, the Garmin and Wahoo devices comp 130 bike computer speed seems off them differently.
I gave you the reasons why I find Wahoo does the mainstream things that comptuer road cycling enthusiasts would want from a GPS better.
Functionality and reliability means more to me than custom data field. I just cant decide between bolt and the regular Elemnt. I undertsand the only differences are screen compuher, a bit of battery life, and the extra row of LEDs.
What do I do??? I find the full sized Elemnt a bit large and distracting for my tastes.
On the other hand, if you are coming from an Edge or lesser series, cmputer BOLT will be more similar except the display is better and the fonts are larger so it is much more comp 130 bike computer speed seems off. I ended up using my Mio wrist HR strap for a while before trying the Tickr again several months later.
It may have been due to a firmware update, but the Tickr issued were resolved. I recently picked this up and find it super useful.
Wahoo could add support for the Varia, but given that it a Garmin product it seems they are not wanting to. I think there are a lot more options with Di2 and Garmin. I have a LG V20 phone. I have to reboot it before it will connect the Bolt.
I suspect this is an issue with my phone and not the Bolt, but it is a bit of a weird glitch. Kuttermax, Thanks comp 130 bike computer speed seems off your report. Bike computer app. to hear about issues with the Tickr and Bolt connecting as they are both Wahoo products.
Do you prefer the more compact size of the bolt. I have had no issues with the smaller size of the Bolt as compared to the Garmin If you comp 130 bike computer speed seems off a ton of data fields displayed at once though, then things can start to get pretty small. Typically on a road ride I like to focus on 3s power, HR, speed, distance, and time. I set the zoom so that I can see those easy.
In the post below Vitaliy has some really great points comparing the Edge to the Bolt. They are very different comp 130 bike computer speed seems off and have big differences in capabilities. I still use my Garmin for mountain biking. I have never compared the two in this regard and have kept the Bolt on my Emonda road bike.
Ultimately if you want a streamlined computer that works garmin polar well and it pretty budget friendly, the Bolt is a great option. However if you really want all the bells and whistles, then the Garmin is likely still the king of the hill. For what best bike computer trek marlin 7 2017 worth. My latest Garmin isout of curiosity I purchased Bolt and used it for about two weeks.
Both screens are very easy to read in the dark and bright standalone bike gps. LEDs on bolt are nice, but almost unusable on sunny days. Sold separately, Lezyne also offers a couple of out-front mounts, and K-Edge just announced one, too.
The X-Mount is a fiddle to install, taking me 20 minutes the first time. The positives are a mount that offers wide stem amazon bike computer cadence, adaptability, and a clean, somewhat integrated, aesthetic. Vike of reinforced plastic and aluminium, the X-Lock is designed to be a modular mount and includes an optional GoPro mount which allows you to use the computer and a camera or compatible light off the shared bracket.
The Lezyne computers are already buke than the competition, and the X-Lock mount design only adds to the height. The X-Lock eighth-turn design works well, but it suffers from an increased stack height over competitor designs. The computer sits unfashionably high from the included mount, and I needed to use the X-Lock mount in its lowest position cokp achieve a flush screen with my stem. In practice, the screen of the Mega C only sits some 4mm higher than a Is it worth to get a map gps for cycling ELEMNT Bolt, and while the added height can actually solve clearance issues in some cases, some riders will still take objection to it regardless.
Unfortunately one of the three mounts Comp 130 bike computer speed seems off tested failed, it would still hold a computer without issue, but did so without the security of the sprung locking mechanism. The Mega computers offer more than basic breadcrumb mapping though they do have thisand that function gets even better if you do a little prior planning with a desktop computer. But even so, much of it relies on an initial connection to a smartphone.
The Mega units offer turn-by-turn schwinn ac performance spin bike with computer, but in order to kick off a route, you must use the Ally 2. The app allows you to navigate to a specified point, or even manually create your own route with relative ease. Lezyne offers both TCX and GPX route compatibility, but only the former allows for two-way communication and turn-by-turn directions.
Once the app uploads and starts the route, your phone connection can end. And assuming you have offline maps loaded, all will be fine. Limited to a Mb bike computer mount for s works sstumpjumper per file, and therefore a certain distance radius, the offline maps can be simply dropped onto the device with a desktop computer.
They can be created through the GPS Ally 2. While painful, multiple and overlapping map tiles can also be uploaded to the device if larger distances are required and the device certainly has the comp 130 bike computer speed seems off to handle multiple mb files.
Maybe the easiest way is to go back in the past, and to produce a gps sensor with Galileo. It should be a comp 130 bike computer speed seems off smaller and it should be compatible not only with Polar products, but with all brands.
I know it would be a little unconfortable to have another sensor in the arm, but we could use it only when we need extra accuracy, for example in races or in intervals workout or in trail running. They conclude that to improve accuracy is better to go with dual frequency. Maybe Galileo dual frequency is better than PPP-single frequency.
Extract of the garmin gps for mountain bike This accurate wpeed can only be achieved when combining multiple positioning methods. One of these methods is presented in this paper: This solution should be at an affordable price with sub-meter position accuracy.
The receiver provides raw measurements to the SF-PPP algorithm which corrects them for different kind of errors. The corrections for the raw measurements are received from a network service via a 4G modem. We evaluated the PPP method in different environments and conditions, with focus on open area, but also for harsh conditions on the highway and in an urban environment to know the current limitations of the method. For the open area environment a horizontal root bke square error RMSe of ofg.
In harsh gps for bike india we suffer from reflections caused by multipath receptions and poor satellite availability due to speeed from trees and buildings which makes the accuracy varying from 0. Future plans to improve the results involve using more satellites from other constellations like GLONASS, using the Doppler shift to estimate the vehicle speed, using dual frequency receiver for ionosphere removal and closer integration with other low-cost sensors and vehicle model.
With new satellites and multiple frequency convergence time is no more minutes, but it can be istantaneous.
A big role in accuracy could be the use of the now free E6 Galileo frequency. However, one como hampering its more widespread adoption is the convergence time required for the carrier-phase ambiguities to be fully resolved so that the centimeter-accuracy threshold can be surpassed. By using a multi-system, multi-carrier-frequency approach, instantaneous centimeter-level PPP can be achieved.
Therefore, it might be possible to extend the applicability of PPP to land navigation in certain urban areas. In urban environments, signal discontinuity and re-convergence still represent the major problem for traditional PPP, which is based on the ionosphere-free combination of two-frequency best mountain bike sos gps tracker and carrier phase. PPP can in theory be performed in those urban areas 1300 buildings are relatively short that provides good signal availability and geometry.
However, it is well known that an additional obstacle compufer urban environments for PPP is signal discontinuity. It depends what you call precise. Comp 130 bike computer speed seems off of bike map tracker that is one reason to have 2 navigation setting run in parallel.
Furthermore navigation in cities will not need that level of com;uter. Coutryside this would mean an issue, there you m450 bike computer have not big building, but maybe deep forest. I did a run years ago London Canary Wharf and co,puter there and with this old device to the track was ok. The issue was noticable, but not really an issue. Finally this is well know and to me has nothing specifically to the Hi John, just speculations on my side.
In the article that you shared gpsworld writes: Your question: So I would say that now it has zero impact also for USA. In the near future how it will impact devices in the USA? The cimputer of a PPP chipset is also a lot bigger of a chipset with standard accuracy.
I compute that no brand will produce a PPP smartwatch in comp 130 bike computer speed seems off near future. They comp 130 bike computer speed seems off, but probably they are more interested in selling watches than gnss sensors Polar used gps sensor in the past, but no more.
Some applications for smartphones can now give high coputer with the newer version of Android using not the Galileo E6 signal but internet services. So it would be enough to produce a chipset that could receive this new frequency.
Maybe in the USA smartphones could use the Galileo E6 frequency becayse smartphones are held by private users?
Galileo with his free PPP service with the E6 frequency wants to give high accuracy at decimeter level. So applications where centimeter accuracy is requested are out of discussion.
But where decimeter accuracy is enough, companies who gain their living giving their services for a fee RTK or PPP with internet wi-fi transmission or radio transmission will suffer the competition of the free without fee Galileo service.
Or maybe for political or economic reasons United States will say that the E6 frequency is not allowed but again: Maybe yes, because gpsworld says that FCC rules are comp 130 bike computer speed seems off for private users but just for companies.
Or maybe Europe will change his mind and it will give ofg service for a fee. When will we see this new E6B signal? Maybe inbest cycling camera 2015 in When will we comp 130 bike computer speed seems off new devices that could use this PPP service?
In sport we will have to wait a long, long time the5krunner just says in short: But it would be nice for intervals on a track where are no buildings! Probably also Galileo domputer waiting to see which new application could use his free PPP service. What impact would that have on the discussion of higher resolution positioning above? Particularly the sentence While private users were free to use the European GNSS, with this ruling entities such as telecommunications companies can now also use Galileo in the link.
Implementing that would still depend on the availability of small, low power chips suitable for a watch, plus antenna designs suitable for the required frequencies. Who is right? Sean Barbeau, the comp 130 bike computer speed seems off of the app GPStest, tells that before 15 November smartphone could receive Galileo satellites outside United States but not in United States see link above.
GpsWorld says that smartphones garmin gps black friday cycling private users could use Galileo satellites also before 15 November If GPSworld is wrong, biie in United States devices receiving gnss signals will be inhibited to receive comp 130 bike computer speed seems off frequency E6, when 2018 edge review third frequency will be available.
Maybe in the firmware Garmin put an option to not permit the reception of Galileo satellites in United States. It would be nice if Garmin would allow again to show the numbers of satellites in view, which satellites are used to obtain the fix and the DOP value the zeems should know this second after second. With these data we could develop an app in CIQ field that shows number of satellites and DOP value and report it in a graph in GarminConnect with the other metrics of the run.
Sean Barbeau in the comp 130 bike computer speed seems off of his forum says: Map my ride compatible bike computer issue with mobile devices is that device location computed with GNSS is used for a lot of different services, including telecommunication system operation and Eapp location, Google Play Services, etc.
In the comments of the same link above in the Sean Barbeau forum an user writes on 6th December Glonass satellites are, of course, visible. So as of Dec. The G8 definitely has the hardware required to see Galileo according to Qualcomm and its Snapdragon processorand bjke device is listed on the UseGalileo.
EU list from the GSA. So, we are still waiting.
Hey, Does speedd still have the terrible shreek beep sound? Nothing quite spoils a nice lonely mountain road more than a Garmin beep.
The Edge 25, you could only have 1 paired at a time so that meant that you had to either take comp 130 bike computer speed seems off the sensors or re-pair to bike 2. Do you by chance know if it is compatible with the Vector 2s?
When looking at seeks page it only shows the Vector 3.
Yes, compatible. Same restrictions as Vector 3 though: No cycling dynamics, no power balance. Just total power and the handful of data fields for power. Any chance you think that eventually, the unit will at least record the cycling dynamics and power balance? I just got one Edge last week. I really 1300 it so far but I will not keep it if those data fields are not accessible….
What it will record and what you are able to show by datafields may defer. You have to options:. Primarily what has been determined so far is, the has almost every field internally available. I just had a chat with them. Comp 130 bike computer speed seems off do not understand why you simple could not check yourself the imported date contains that stuff recorded.
So why not test yourself what has been recorded? If you are keen on specific data my assumption was you have some favourite software you use and this will the data or not.
My apologies for not understanding at first. Yes, this is what I did, and those parameters are not available.
Too bad, otherwise the would be the perfect unit. Have look at the Lezyne Mega C maybe. I am disappointed by the and Garmin again.
The Wahoo Bolt for me is not an alternative as the Display is to bad. But maybe something for you. The sport functions should feed your needs. Is ofc worth comp 130 bike computer speed seems off almost new Edge to Edge ? Edge is used as display device during triathlon, main device is Fenix 3. Basically, it takes new firmware on the device, and I think by and large the firmware updates for new features spefd ceased for the FRXT. I had the this exact question about my trusty What about the Fenix clmp And do you think FE-C control is something that can be added in an update?
I know Kinomap had talked about it, but also not sure if it ever came true. Suspect that is even less likely than just having an intern try to biek the E FE-C code garmin edge speed sensor to the E I think you missed something here: I say this because the Lezyne budge units as well a the Polar M bike anti theft device gps track power balance just fine.
Nor do they have anything like ConnectIQ. They certainly can press Garmin on usability, reliability and some unique features maybe even pricebut they will probably lose offf terms of navigation and advanced feature sets. It makes setting data fields so much easier. Question on the mirroring: Or can I somehow do 8 since the unit allows 8?
A couple of nice features with the watch display mirroring and real time Orf segment racing, but beyond that I think the Lezyne may give you more for comp 130 bike computer speed seems off money. Been on my forever list. I do agree that both Lezyne and Polar give you more features structured workouts, better data collection for the price, though I think Garmin is probably a cleaner implementation across their ecosystem.
I suppose just computer brands comparison case of what one values.
They are pushing it way harder than the big comp 130 bike computer speed seems off. But is it the problem? They are not a sufficiently recognised name yet? They are in Amazon spred, which comp 130 bike computer speed seems off an improvement over the comp 130 bike computer speed seems off, but finding them in retail bike shops sesms tougher.
There are dual-frequency chips reaching the market now which will support this, and speeed could give a huge leap in accuracy for small devices like watches. But — only for devices which have both a chip and an antenna supporting the two frequency bands offf. Is the absense of custom workouts not a big issue? How do you go about if you want to do intervals training? Hi Ray, any idea if the extended display will be available for the XT watch?
If so this will be a no-brainer for me! Garmin, etc are all rated down to c. The has a operating temperature range of c to 60c. That makes it Fat Biker worthy. Maybe you can add operating temperature to your info.
There are a lot of us Fat Bikers out there. But especially since you call in a In-Depth review. What about a comparison between this and an Edge 25? Or will the replace it? Because in functionality they are very close! Koen, you can run your own comparison between the and Really interested in how the mirroring from the works.
Sounds like an awesome Edge replacement. Ben Delany over at Bike Radar raves about the screen. This would have been a great little device for the TT bike whereby you only wanted to view some key data with one of them being IF. Amazed they could not include this!!! Additionaly I have a couple of garmin gps comparisons. The confusing thing speeed price, if there is no heart rate strap.
I just got the final boxed versions last night and simply ran out of time to shoot them in the light. They had previously just sent over the final production unit, sans-box. It looks good on the semes, though super small. For 2 besides two different comp 130 bike computer speed seems off, the price is more confusing for me.
Ups, just found my mistake. So you can ignore previous comment, but anyway who knows why two different bundles. You can beat the features for this price. If I had this as an option I would have bought this. Yup, totally sync via BLE over spred. Wife likes her HUD. All they needed bike computer with compass wireless do here was modernise the Edge As should being able to send seemms to comp 130 bike computer speed seems off on the device.
Ckmp there with you Robert. I want a bike computer with all the power metrics life wireless bike computer live track to the size of the xeems smaller. I am too slow to worry about Strava segments. I generally tend to agree.
I like to minimize the number of devices involved and keep the dashboard similar to my outdoor configuration. Some interesting tips and more in comments about getting a. With that said, I have been waiting on something to replace my trusty You should tell them that no nominal power makes this a no go for triathlete with a power meter.
It is a deal break, add those metrics and I would have my credit card ready. Again, just going off top eeems comp 130 bike computer speed seems off head measurements. Gps adventure bike it receiving 1 or 2 Galileo frequencies?
You have less sensor connectivity options e. I may just grab the Lezyne guys tomorrow and Sea Otter and sit down and do it in their booth. Also a time to destination and distance to destination fields are lacking on the data fields. Grumble grumble grumble….
Guess it must be speec in a rush. Keep your work up Ray! Did You ride with speed sensor? I would like to know, if the speed is primarly from speed sensor when one is attached. While I almost always have a speed sensor on my bike, I rarely reset speedzon bike computer specialized it connected to a unit.
One short question Ray: I only do mountain-biking and have been comp 130 bike computer speed seems off vike a device like this for quite some time. Thanks Ray for your answer, I am looking forward to your findings from your mountain-bike rides…. Any information regarding antenna strength? Any problems connecting to sensors? My Fenix 5 is a huge disappointment as it cannot keep a connection comp 130 bike computer speed seems off my stages gen 2 with constant dropouts if it connects at all.
My old Edge working ok but problems with shorter dropouts now and then. Nor any HR drop-outs. But then again, none of those tend to be the units that have issues like your Stages. Auto scroll?
You used to post size comparison pictures lots even when it was quite irrelevant. But for something this tiny it would have been nice. In case of Edge can I mix and match the sensors by communication type? Hi Ray. Thanks a lot for this in-depth review; you rock as always! Comp 130 bike computer speed seems off fancy on my end. Probably train for century ride. I was looking into either the or Bolt, but those may be way more than i need. Ken, Really, any of them will be fine.
Otherwise, they will all track your time, speed, distance, cadence with a sensorpower with a sensorheart rate with a sensoretc. However, most smart trainers are also controlled by their phone comp 130 bike computer speed seems off and most people are using Zwift anyway. So, no real big deal. More importantly, Ken, you exemplify the garmin gps for mountain bike Garmin has got themselves in.
Not to mention, a dozen watches that will also track your bike ride.
News:Apr 4, - Garmin Edge By the time you've finished taking off your shoes, your ride can be up on a computer for speed and distance, a monochromatic screen is racing and riding these products to determine the best options.
Leave a Comment